Aidan Kim vs David Metz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kim vs Metz analysis and find out who is favored!
Aidan Kim vs David Metz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Metz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 45.28% of points on his second serve, while Metz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 53.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Metz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.88% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 61.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Metz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 40% of matches played (W/L 4/ 6), with Metz winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Metz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/ 5), where as Metz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kim winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim winning 2 and Metz winning 0. The last match between Kim and Metz was at the M15 Fayetteville, 31-10-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Aidan Kim getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kim and Metz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kim winning 0 times and Metz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kim winning 0, and Metz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of 213.4 while Metz has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Metz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Metz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Aidan Kim
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
877
Rank
700
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
David Metz
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
47% (26-29)
Career Total W/L
24% (4-13)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Aidan Kim | David Metz |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Aidan Kim | David Metz |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (21/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.62 | 0 |
Aces Total | 13 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.52 | 0 |
DFs Total | 11 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:51:30 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (97/150) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (61/97) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (24/53) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (7/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (62/146) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aidan Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Axel Nefve
Player
Aidan Kim
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
6
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Kim
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Aidan Kim
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
2
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Aidan Kim
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Aidan Kim
Player
Semen Pankin
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
61)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Kim
Player
Preston Brown
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
32%
(
17 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ethan Quinn
Player
Aidan Kim
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Kim
Player
Daniel Little
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Evan Zhu
Player
Aidan Kim
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-7(5) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
F |
Dmitry Popko
Player
Aidan Kim
41%
(
24 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
David Metz Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-7(5) 6-4 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more